Immigrants’ Rights

California is home to more immigrants than any other state in the country. The ACLU of Northern California works to defend immigrants’ constitutional rights, end immigration detention, and stop state and local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Outline of the State of California overlaid with pictures of activists holding signs saying "Keep families together" and "Keep communities whole" and a plane flying over barbed wire

The Latest


Press Release
people at the CA state capitol holding signs that say "keep communities whole" and "keep families together"

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Clears Way to Reestablish TPS Protections for Hundreds of Thousands of Venezuelans

Unless the U.S. Supreme Court intervenes, Venezuelans’ TPS will be reinstated on November 6 while the lawsuit proceeds
News & Commentary
Dolores Huerta in ACLU News

ACLU NorCal Remembers Civil Rights Icon Dolores Huerta

Dolores Huerta will forever be remembered for her resilience and ability to speak truth to power.
Resource
Placeholder image

Recursos de la ACLU del Norte de California

¡Estamos exhortando a la gente a que salga a votar en estas elecciones porque votar es su poder!
Podcast
Carmen King and Emi MacLean speaking on MAKE the CASE podcast

MAKE the CASE: How White Supremacy is Driving Trump’s Immigration Policy

What happens when the government considers America a country club for which they control membership and not a democracy that is supposed to welcome all? Join Emi MacLean, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Northern California, in a discussion about the repercussions of a recent Supreme Court ruling and the urgent need for comprehensive immigration reform. Each episode of MAKE the CASE takes you behind the scenes of a consequential case or issue making headlines, unpacking what’s at stake, why the ACLU gets involved, and whose rights could be affected. Listen to MAKE the CASE on our website and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

Cases, Campaigns & Legislation


Court Case
Apr 15, 2026

Mullin v. Dahlia Doe

Mullin v. Dahlia Doe challenged the Trump administration’s decision to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for thousands of Syrian immigrants living and working legally in the United States while it is unsafe for them to return to their home country. The case was consolidated with Trump v. Miot, a case concerning Haitian TPS holders. The Supreme Court expedited the case for judicial review, granting certiorari before judgment based on a preliminary ruling from the district court. In its Supreme Court’s June 25, 2026 6-3 ruling, the Court allowed the TPS terminations of Syria and Haiti to proceed, resulting in the loss of legal status and the right to work for over 350,000 people. The Supreme Court held that there was no judicial review for the plaintiffs’ statutory claims; and that the constitutional equal protection claim was unlikely to succeed on the merits. TPS is a program established by Congress in 1990 to protect individuals who cannot safely return to their home country due to war, natural disaster, or other emergencies. TPS holders are mothers, fathers, workers, and contributing members of their communities. They rely on this humanitarian protection regime for safety. The Supreme Court’s ruling impacts not only Syrian and Haitian TPS holders but all 1.3 million individuals from 17 countries designated for TPS. At the time the Supreme Court heard this case on April 29, 2026, the Trump administration had terminated TPS for 13 countries—despite ongoing wars and undisputed humanitarian crises. Alongside our co-counsel the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), Muslim Advocates, Van Der Hout LLP, and the National ACLU, the ACLU of Northern California represents seven Syrian nationals with TPS or pending applications in Mullin v. Dahlia Doe, a class action lawsuit originally filed in October 2025. Cancelling TPS designation for Syria subjects nearly 6,100 Syrian TPS holders, along with 800 Syrians with pending applications, to immigrant detention and possible deportation to an unsafe country. The Miot case, consolidated with Doe, affects 350,000 Haitian TPS holders. The plaintiffs argued that the DHS Secretary does not have the legal authority to unilaterally override the TPS statute enacted by Congress, and that it is the role of the judiciary to review the government’s legally dubious actions. The Supreme Court adopted the government’s extreme position that even lawless decisions that violated clear statutory mandates were not reviewable.
Court Case
Oct 11, 2025

Garro Pinchi, et al. v. Noem, et al.

We filed a class-action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s policy of re-arresting and re-detaining immigrants the government previously had released from custody after concluding they were neither dangerous nor a flight risk.
Court Case
Jun 24, 2026

Pablo Sequen, et al. v. Albarran, et al.

We filed a class-action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s policy of arresting immigrants when they appear for court in Northern California and holding them in inhumane conditions inside the San Francisco ICE field office.
Court Case
Jul 9, 2025

National TPS Alliance v. Noem (NTPSA II)

National TPS Alliance v. Noem (NTPSA II) is a legal challenge to the Trump administration’s unlawful efforts to dismantle the statutorily mandated Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program for Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua, which provides humanitarian protection for people who cannot safely return to their home countries.