All Cases

180 Court Cases
Court Case
Aug 25, 2010
default statue of liberty torch
  • LGBTQ+ Rights

Perry v. Schwarzenegger

Court Case
Jun 23, 2010
Placeholder image
  • Privacy and Technology

Amazon.com v. Kenneth R. Lay

Court Case
May 05, 2010
Placeholder image
  • Police Practices

People v. Gallego

Should the police be able to follow you around and collect and analyze your DNA from something you discard, without a warrant or even a reason to believe you have committed a crime? 
Court Case
Feb 01, 2010
shutterstock_83102185.jpg
  • Criminal Law Reform

In re E.J. on Habeas Corpus (Prop 83 Residency Restrictions)

Can the State of California retroactively enforce Prop 83's residency restrictions against sex offenders who committed their offenses before the law went into effect?
Court Case
Feb 01, 2010
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Law Reform

People v. Milligan

Court Case
Jan 25, 2010
Placeholder image
  • Racial Justice

Darensburg v. MTC

On November 23, 2009, the ACLU Foundation of Northern California and civil rights allies filed an amicus brief in Darensburg v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Plaintiffs argued that MTC, the planning body for all twenty-six independent transit operators in the Bay Area, consistently under-funded AC Transit, a bus line with high minority ridership, in comparison to other transit systems like BART, with lower minority ridership.
Court Case
Aug 29, 2009
default statue of liberty torch
  • Free Speech

International Society of Krishna Consciousness of California v. City of Los Angeles

Court Case
Aug 20, 2009
default statue of liberty torch
  • LGBTQ+ Rights

Strauss v. Horton

On Nov. 5, 2008, the ACLU Foundation of Northern California, along with the National Center for Lesbian Rights and Lambda Legal, filed a writ petition in the California Supreme Court challenging the validity of Proposition 8. Proposition 8, passed by a narrow majority of California voters in the November 2008 election, purports to amend California's Constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Equality California and six couples who did not marry before the election but would like to be able to marry now.
Court Case
Jul 08, 2009
shutterstock_144639308.jpg
  • Immigrants' Rights

AFL-CIO v. Chertoff (Challenge to DHS "No-Match" Rule)

In August 2007, the AFL-CIO and other groups filed suit to stop government officials from implementing a Department of Homeland Security regulation that created widespread concern about anti-immigrant discrimination in employment and unnecessary and unjust terminations.