All Cases

46 Court Cases
Court Case
Jun 23, 2020
BLM voting place banner
  • Free Speech|
  • +1 Issue

Unitarian Universalist v. Orth (Free Speech)

The ACLU sued Fresno County's top election official in dispute over Church Black Lives Matter banners.
Court Case
Mar 13, 2019
Students Madera banner
  • Free Speech|
  • +2 Issues

Reeder v. Chawanakee Unified School District (LGBTQ Yearbook Quotes)

The ACLU sued Chawanakee Unified School District for censoring two students' pro-LGBTQ yearbook quotes.
Court Case
Jan 22, 2019
sign saying "stop censoring on social media"
  • Free Speech|
  • +2 Issues

Faison v. Jones (Free Speech)

The ACLU Foundation of Northern California filed suit against Sacramento Sheriff Scott Jones on behalf of Black Lives Matter leaders who were unlawfully blocked from the sheriff's official Facebook page. Tanya Faison and Sonia Lewis, co-leaders of Black Lives Matter Sacramento, have been vocal critics of the sheriff and other law enforcement officials. Both had comments deleted and were blocked from the sheriff's page during a critical time of public debate about whether the sheriff's department should be subjected to outside oversight.
Court Case
Aug 27, 2018
man looking at computer
  • Free Speech|
  • +1 Issue

Raimondo v. FBI (Internet Free Speech)

In 2004, the FBI conducted a “threat assessment” of long-time journalists and commentators Justin Raimondo and Eric Garris, as well as their website, Antiwar.com. In violation of the federal Privacy Act, this threat assessment compiled descriptions of the journalists’ First Amendment activities without any apparent law enforcement purpose. Attorneys at the ACLU Foundation of Northern California and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP represented the journalists in a federal lawsuit against the FBI. Records the journalists received in response to their Freedom of Information Act claims revealed that the threat assessment was based on shoddy investigative work in addition to the apparent targeting of the journalists’ political speech. In the litigation, the FBI asserted that it was entitled to create this threat assessment because of Antiwar.com’s posting of government documents. But the First Amendment has long protected the publication of government secrets and the FBI never even suggested that the journalists or Antiwar.com had violated the law by obtaining or posting those documents.
Court Case
Dec 08, 2016
Client in Gill v. DOJ case speaking at press conference
  • Free Speech|
  • +4 Issues

Gill v. DOJ (Challenge to Federal Suspicious Activity Reporting)

The ACLU Foundations of California filed a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s Suspicious Activity Reporting program - a vast expansion of the federal government’s domestic intelligence network. The SAR program targets First Amendment-protected activity, encourages racial and religious profiling, and violates federal law. The plaintiffs are five U.S. citizens whose information has been entered into counterterrorism databases for engaging in lawful conduct.
Court Case
Oct 31, 2016
ballot selfie
  • Free Speech

ACLU Foundations of California v. Alex Padilla (Ballot Selfies)

The ACLU Foundations of California filed suit against Secretary of State Alex Padilla challenging two statutes that prohibit voters from sharing ballot selfies. The suit asks for a temporary restraining order to prohibit the state from enforcing the ban for the November presidential election.
Court Case
Sep 22, 2016
youth looking at a cell phone
  • Free Speech

Hassell v. Bird (Yelp Free Speech)

The CA Supreme Court has agreed to review a case that could have allowed people to censor online speech without even giving the website’s owner an opportunity to come to court to defend itself.
Court Case
Feb 27, 2016
ACLU client Taylor Victor
  • Free Speech|
  • +2 Issues

T.V. v. Beukelman (Student Censorship)

Court Case
Oct 26, 2015
person wearing a hooded sweatshirt typing on laptop
  • Free Speech

Doe v. Harris (Internet Free Speech)

A federal class-action lawsuit brought by the ACLU Foundation of Northern California to block implementation of unconstitutional provisions of a ballot measure that restricts the protected speech of sex offenders registered in California.