All Cases

180 Court Cases
Court Case
Mar 22, 2017
US customs agents
  • Immigrants' Rights

J.I. v. United States (Sexual Assault)

The ACLU Foundation of Northern California filed claims with the federal government on behalf of sisters who were led by a U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer into a small room, one at a time, and sexually assaulted.
Court Case
Mar 14, 2017
police car lights
  • Criminal Law Reform|
  • +1 Issue

People ex rel. Pierson v. Superior Court (Grand Juries)

In 2015, the California Legislature enacted SB 227 to try to ensure that prosecutors use a public process when deciding whether to criminally charge police officers accused in shootings or other uses of excessive force, as opposed to using secret grand-jury proceedings. The Court of Appeal held that the law is unconstitutional because it conflicts the constitutional role of the grand jury. The ACLU Foundations of California supported SB 227 and has now asked the California Supreme Court to grant review in the case. 
Court Case
Mar 13, 2017
Source https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AlumRockViewSiliconValley_w.jpg
  • Criminal Law Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Santa Clara County v. Donald J. Trump (Sanctuary Cities)

The ACLU Foundation of Northern California representing YWCA of Silicon Valley filed a motion to intervene in this lawsuit challenging President Trump’s executive order threatening to withhold federal funding from so-called "sanctuary cities." 
Court Case
Mar 02, 2017
computer with cell phone
  • Open Government

City of San Jose v. Superior Court (Government Transparency)

The City of San Jose claims that that electronic messages dealing with official business that its employees send to one another are not public records if the employees send them using their personal accounts or devices. The ACLU Foundations of California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation are asking the California Supreme Court to grant review in the interest of an open and transparent government. 
Court Case
Feb 03, 2017
we stand with muslim travelers
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Roe 1 v. Trump (Muslim Ban)

The ACLU Foundation of Northern California sued President Donald J. Trump, the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection for establishing and enforcing an unconstitutional and discriminatory Muslim ban.
Court Case
Dec 08, 2016
Client in Gill v. DOJ case speaking at press conference
  • Free Speech|
  • +4 Issues

Gill v. DOJ (Challenge to Federal Suspicious Activity Reporting)

The ACLU Foundations of California filed a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s Suspicious Activity Reporting program - a vast expansion of the federal government’s domestic intelligence network. The SAR program targets First Amendment-protected activity, encourages racial and religious profiling, and violates federal law. The plaintiffs are five U.S. citizens whose information has been entered into counterterrorism databases for engaging in lawful conduct.
Court Case
Dec 08, 2016
Four portraits of clients in Sanchez v. Caltrans
  • Economic Justice|
  • +2 Issues

Sanchez v. California Department of Transportation

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is violating the constitutional rights of homeless people by confiscating and destroying their property in ongoing sweeps. The class-action suit seeks a permanent injunction to stop this illegal practice throughout California. 
Court Case
Nov 10, 2016
San Quentin
  • Criminal Law Reform

Sims v. CDCR (California Death Penalty)

The ACLU Foundation of Northern California filed a lawsuit challenging a law that gives unlimited discretion over executions to the California Department of Corrections. 
Court Case
Oct 31, 2016
ballot selfie
  • Free Speech

ACLU Foundations of California v. Alex Padilla (Ballot Selfies)

The ACLU Foundations of California filed suit against Secretary of State Alex Padilla challenging two statutes that prohibit voters from sharing ballot selfies. The suit asks for a temporary restraining order to prohibit the state from enforcing the ban for the November presidential election.