Singer at TPS rally

The Fight is Not Over: Clear the Path to Legal Status

July 21, 2026
The Supreme Court greenlit the Trump administration’s destruction of a critical humanitarian immigration program. We’re fighting back.

In the political and social climate we currently live in, it is inconceivable that a bipartisan Congress would pass a law, signed by the president, that has at its core humanitarian concern for immigrants. Yet, this simple principled value led to the 1990 law creating Temporary Protected Status (TPS), the program that has been one focal point of our immigrants’ rights work since President Donald Trump returned to office with a vengeance to dismantle it.

TPS was designed to give relief to immigrants already in the United States who could not safely return to their home countries due to ongoing armed conflict, environmental disasters, or other life threatening and dangerous conditions. Since its inception, TPS provided protection from detention and deportation, authorization to work and, with some stipulations, the ability to leave and reenter the United States.

With these protections, the lives of millions have been saved and spared from war, disaster, and catastrophe. In turn, communities across the U.S. have benefited from myriad contributions from TPS holders. As of March 2025, over one million people from 17 countries were TPS recipients. All, except Ukraine, represented countries inhabited by people who would be colloquially called “people of color” or non-Christian—a significant observation in the telling of this story.

During Trump’s first term in office, an explicit goal of his administration was to end TPS designations for most of the protected countries as part of his overall xenophobic immigration agenda. These efforts were successfully thwarted by the TPS holders we represented, along with our co-counsel ACLU SoCal, the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON), and the law firm of Sidley Austin LLP.

After re-election, the Trump administration was further emboldened. Project 2025, the playbook that fine-tuned the incoming administration’s nefarious immigration strategies, targeted the mass deportations of immigrants, even those with lawful status like TPS holders.

On April 29, a stand-off between values of inclusivity vs. exclusivity came to a crescendo at the Supreme Court. ACLU NorCal joined the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), Muslim Advocates, Van Der Hout LLP, NDLON, the UCLA Miñana Center for Immigration Law and Policy, and the National ACLU as co-counsel on Mullin v. Dahlia Doe, which challenged the Trump administration’s decision to terminate TPS for thousands of Syrian immigrants living and working legally in the United States while their country is at war. The court fast-tracked that case and combined it with Trump v. Miot, a second lawsuit contesting the termination of TPS for over 350,000 Haitians.

Key members of the legal team: Jessica Bansal from National Day Laborer Organizing Network, Ahilan Arulanantham from Miñana Family Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, and Emi MacLean from ACLU NorCal.

Key members of the legal team (left to right): Jessica Bansal from National Day Laborer Organizing Network, Ahilan Arulanantham from Miñana Family Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, and Emi MacLean from ACLU NorCal.

With short notice the legal team led a herculean effort to build the strongest case possible, defending the legal and constitutional rights of TPS holders. The lived experience of TPS holders was before the court and underscored the unconscionable toll it would take on them if the government prevailed in dismantling TPS.

Hours before oral argument began on that cold and windy April morning, TPS holders from the 17 countries in jeopardy gathered outside the Supreme Court in a display of solidarity with one another. Music and song filled the air as if to permeate the court’s concrete and marble edifice and support the attorneys inside who had the enormous responsibility of pleading their case. But, despite a solid strategy and masterful effort by legal counsel and advocates, on June 25, in a 6-3 ruling, the Court sided with the Trump administration’s position allowing the TPS terminations of Syria and Haiti to go forward. The Supreme Court limited judicial oversight of violations of the TPS law. The lopsided majority decision also ignored Trump’s clearly racist statements about Haitian TPS holders and held that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the termination of Haiti’s TPS designation violated the Constitution’s prohibition against race discrimination. While the ruling directly affects only Haitian and Syrian TPS holders, it will impact all 1.3 million individuals from 17 countries designated for TPS.

By contrast, it is essential to remember that over 6,000 white South African Afrikaners have been given the red carpet, carte blanche invitation to the United States as refugees under patently false and racist pretenses. This immigration policy apparently supports the whitening of America, the government’s monochromatic vision for the racial composition of this country.

As of this writing, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is seeking to expedite the effective date of this order. TPS holders from Haiti and Syria are expected to lose their right to work in the coming days. Work permits for Venezuelan, Nicaraguan, Honduran, Nepali, Afghan, and Cameroonian TPS holders have already expired; some have already been deported. In the coming months, work permits and legal status also may lapse for people from Ethiopia, Myanmar (Burma), Somalia, South Sudan, and Yemen. The immediate results will be a crisis of unknown proportions as families lose income earners, and individuals and businesses are put at risk in numerous ways. Thousands will be in danger of deportation and detention, in the largest de-documentation event in U.S. history. Deportees to most of these countries will face imminent danger. “SCOTUS has left a stain on the court and the country,” ACLU NorCal Senior Staff Attorney Emi MacLean said. “But the fight is not over.”

While we continue to advocate in court, we also turn to Congress. Each of us can call on Congress to enact immigration reform that offers a path to permanent legal status for TPS holders who are now at grave risk. Congress introduced the Safe Environment from Countries Under Repression and Emergency Act (S. 2106) to provide TPS recipients with a pathway to lawful permanent residence and shield them from deportation. The American Dream and Promise Act (H.R. 1589) in the House also aims to provide a pathway to citizenship for DACA and TPS recipients. Please look for further updates from the ACLU on these two pieces of legislation.

This month, as Americans celebrated 250 years since the country was established and congratulated themselves for building a democracy, let’s not make a mockery of the invitation from Lady Liberty that sits on the Hudson River in New York:

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

Related Content


News & Commentary
Apr 24, 2026
TPS holders Walkelis and Jhony with their children
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +1 Issue

For the Record: Documenting the Trump Administration’s Mass De-Documentation Project

ACLU civil rights investigator Emilia Garcia has spent the past year speaking with people whose lives have been upended by the termination of TPS.
News & Commentary
Jul 02, 2026
Photo of the hand of the Statue of Liberty holding the book of the American Declaration of Independence
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +4 Issues

After This Supreme Court Term, We're Doubling Down on America's Founding Promise

The struggle between exclusion and equal protection defines American history — and this moment.
Court Case
Apr 15, 2026
Hand holding a sign that says "Protect TPS holders" in front of the U.S. Supreme Court
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Mullin v. Dahlia Doe

Mullin v. Dahlia Doe challenged the Trump administration’s decision to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for thousands of Syrian immigrants living and working legally in the United States while it is unsafe for them to return to their home country. The case was consolidated with Trump v. Miot, a case concerning Haitian TPS holders. The Supreme Court expedited the case for judicial review, granting certiorari before judgment based on a preliminary ruling from the district court. In its Supreme Court’s June 25, 2026 6-3 ruling, the Court allowed the TPS terminations of Syria and Haiti to proceed, resulting in the loss of legal status and the right to work for over 350,000 people. The Supreme Court held that there was no judicial review for the plaintiffs’ statutory claims; and that the constitutional equal protection claim was unlikely to succeed on the merits. TPS is a program established by Congress in 1990 to protect individuals who cannot safely return to their home country due to war, natural disaster, or other emergencies. TPS holders are mothers, fathers, workers, and contributing members of their communities. They rely on this humanitarian protection regime for safety. The Supreme Court’s ruling impacts not only Syrian and Haitian TPS holders but all 1.3 million individuals from 17 countries designated for TPS. At the time the Supreme Court heard this case on April 29, 2026, the Trump administration had terminated TPS for 13 countries—despite ongoing wars and undisputed humanitarian crises. Alongside our co-counsel the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), Muslim Advocates, Van Der Hout LLP, and the National ACLU, the ACLU of Northern California represents seven Syrian nationals with TPS or pending applications in Mullin v. Dahlia Doe, a class action lawsuit originally filed in October 2025. Cancelling TPS designation for Syria subjects nearly 6,100 Syrian TPS holders, along with 800 Syrians with pending applications, to immigrant detention and possible deportation to an unsafe country. The Miot case, consolidated with Doe, affects 350,000 Haitian TPS holders. The plaintiffs argued that the DHS Secretary does not have the legal authority to unilaterally override the TPS statute enacted by Congress, and that it is the role of the judiciary to review the government’s legally dubious actions. The Supreme Court adopted the government’s extreme position that even lawless decisions that violated clear statutory mandates were not reviewable.
News & Commentary
Jul 22, 2026
US Supreme Court facade with color blocked shapes overlaying it
  • Voting Rights|
  • +3 Issues

Legal Analysis: One of the Most Consequential U.S. Supreme Court Terms in Recent History

In one of the most consequential terms in recent history, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down decisions that will reshape the law for years to come.